You’ve read most of this story hundreds of times
before. In fact, it’s so old that the
civilized world has anesthetized itself and sterilized a blight on our
civilization with terms like the “Resources Curse” and “Dysfunctional States”. Countries rich in minerals and energy where
poverty – both in economic and social terms – run rampant; where officials are
prone to bribery and corruption; and where, when faced with a world turning a
deaf ear and a blind eye to the people, desperate people turn to violence in a
predictable last grasp for something to control. Blood runs.
Families are destroyed. And the
perpetrators sponsor lavish seminars with their elite friends to discuss the
hopelessness of a world filled with savages.
Paradoxically, Rio Tinto’s CEO reportedly has decided to participate in
a campaign to “raise awareness” around human trafficking as part of the firm’s
London Olympic sponsorship despite the labor abuses, impoverished living
conditions, and sex trade affiliated with its mining operations. Apparently “awareness raising” serves as his
copper and gold Pontius basin in which he launders his conscience and that of
his investors. And best of all, in the
name of Corporate Social Responsibility, even PAX Global and Praxis Core Stock
Fund (funds that prey on the disembodied conscience of uninformed investors)
invest in the perpetrators who, according to them are necessary components of
investment portfolios despite being part of a “messy and imperfect” compromise.
But you haven’t read THIS story. Because this story hasn’t been told
before. And if you listen to Australian
media (ABC, to be specific), you may have been led to believe that this story
could not be told.
In 1967, under the UN-authorized colonial custodianship of
Papua New Guinea by the Australian government (jointly liable for the
atrocities described herein) and eight years before independence, the
Bougainville Copper Agreement was executed granting occupiers the control of
one of the world’s largest copper (and other mineral) assets. This agreement, forced into the “peaceful”
independence agreement in 1975, granted a company (now Bougainville Copper Ltd
– majority owned by Rio Tinto) rights to 42 years of mining with compulsory 21
year renewals irrespective of any law or Act of the government. This provision, in a letter to then Prime
Minister Sir Michael Somare, was invoked by BCL Chairman Peter Taylor demanding
that the Company enjoy renewal of its mining license prior to its expiration at
the end of 2011. Peter was simply
reminding Sir Michael Somare of the agreement he had signed with R.W. Ballmer
of BCL in 1967.
Bougainville became
synonymous with the worst of mining.
Politicians were pitted against their citizens’ interests; clans were
variously favored or ignored by the Company leading to bitter enmity and
violence; and, in the late 1980s, the situation became intolerable. A landowner conflict erupted into a war in
which the Company was forced to cease its operations and over 20,000 people
were abducted, tortured and killed. And,
to add insult to injury, in the fig leaf promoted as a Peace Agreement, the
Bougainville government was given the 19% equity ownership once provided the
National Government – equity that gave no PNG party any meaningful corporate or
economic controls when issued – and an interest that, without production, had
negligible value to Bougainville.
To listen to the international media regarding Bougainville since the conflict in 1989 is to see images
of fierce armed fighters, destroyed infrastructure, and destitute living
conditions. To hear BCL speak of the
mine and the project is to hear about the need to pacify people for which they’ve
exhibited nothing but contempt for 45 years. The vitriolic propaganda spewing from remote
shareholders is only outdone by opportunistic bureaucrats seeking to use their
public office to pander to would-be operators who would love to rip new holes
in the fabric of the land and its people with just another destructive
operation. To watch the footage from ABC
in Australia,
you would be advised that this is a place of dysfunction, lawlessness and
hopelessness.
But that was before this week. Because this week, during the consummation of
a six week global financial and corporate literacy program that we helped
develop and deploy, I had a chance to spend time in Panguna and Arawa and meet
the people that have been the object of Australian, UN, and global contempt for
decades. Teaching them about the unconscionable
acts that formed the BCA prior to independence and the intolerable
supra-national rights granted to a company by a custodial administrator acting
under the authority of the UN, we saw hundreds of people realize that those who
they were told were “development partners” had in fact been complicit in grave
injustices. Showing them a corporate
structure – like so many in Papua
New Guinea and around the world – where equity,
financing, leasing, taxation, and self-dealing arrangements aid in the
misappropriation of assets to the detriment of the people awakened a level of
passion unseen since the beginning of this stain on humanity’s record. And, much to the surprise of the common
narrative promoted by remote privateers, the people did not resort to violence.
Rather, they sought more
information. Because, as is always the
case, abusers maintain their power by the persistence of ignorance, not by
transparency and full exchange of facts.
And then what happened next was most poignant. Sitting in the back of the room at a 3 hour
session in Arawa was a muscular man with a fatigue hat on his head. He sat motionless for 3 hours looking at me
with piercing eyes. And before I was
finished, he left. The next morning, my
companions said, “Chris Uma wants to meet with you.” Chris is one of the men who the outside world
– the world terrifyingly romanticized by a company that wants another bite at
its ill-gotten apple – has been told to fear.
This General of the Mekamui Defense Force – most often pictured with
battle-hardened visage and armed with automatic weapons wanted to meet me. Meeting with Chris was not part of my plan but
that’s part of the story.
Chris may very well have the firmest handshake in Papua New Guinea. He’s muscular, powerful and our first
interaction involved the dissolution of every one of the propaganda-laced
messages that have been littered around the world by those with something to
hide. “We know that we’ve been lied to
for all these years,” he said, “but now finally someone – a white man – has come
and told us the truth that we all knew must be out there.” And after that statement, Chris, many of his
men, and our delegation had a long conversation about what true resource
development could look like. Together we
went to the “NO GO ZONE” on the road to Panguna. And when there – a world away from the terror
that has been promoted by so many who have so much to hide – we had fun. We picked flowers and put them into the
barrels of the weapons that, in a moment of honest exchange, served no hostile
purpose. We sat together and talked
about a future built on mutual respect. And best of all, we agreed that it was time
for the world to see a new picture of Bougainville.
Rather than the story of brokenness,
violence, death, and treachery, an image of what happens when people sit
together with mutual respect was allowed to emerge. And then, the man the world has been told to
fear; the man who has been enraged by the injustice meted to him and the people
living around him; the man who only saw violence as a means to have a voice;
that man removed his hat and placed a flower in his hair while the gun barrels
that once blocked a hostile world became vases for the flowers of a new
day.
David,
ReplyDeleteI’m struck by a stark contrast, with some surface irony; that Michael Somare, in his own clan tradition, is a Sana, a ‘peacemaker’ (who’s role is said to include having parties to battle feast together before fighting), and that Rio Tinto is about to don the garland of sponsorship for the Olympics (which began as the mutual engagement in sport among otherwise warring provinces). Both traditions held precedent for intentional alternatives to enmity, stays of respect inserted into the even longer traditions of often lethal opposition, creative interruptions of cyclic violences. Yet in the midst of the systemic violence of opaque complicities, and insular distancing from informed decency, you David, are enacting the very impetus of the ’Olympics’(before co-opted by nationalisms and opportunist advertisement) and stepping into the role of Sana (albeit, with an extra-traditional initiation: conscience).
The sacred initiations of pre-colonial Sana, and the practicing of peace at the original Olympics, each involved a training distinct from preparations for conflict alone. Means and ends met in the participants who dropped sword and shield, in the case of Olympians, or were passed a spear transmuted in its usage, in the case of the Sana, thereby habituating to whatever degree some active alternative to the brutal juggernaut of exclusive triumph.
One act cognizant of mutuality is greater than eons spent on insular interests, because every lifetime takes place in the fields of mutuality, the Commons, which doesn’t wait for acknowledgment before bestowing, abundantly, any necessity. To act on mutuality, whether a person, a community, or a corporation, is to support the continuation of the very systems which steward us. Returning that favor is my own greatest joy, and can be an even greater efficacy when applied to policy and practice at the collective levels.
Kerry, this is a great context-setting piece and adds richly to the message that this event has catalyzed. Many thanks!
ReplyDelete