Sixty years ago today, the world awoke with one less
landmass. On March 1, 1954, the United
States detonated a 15 megaton thermonuclear hydrogen bomb in the 'secret'
Castle Bravo test. At about 1,000 times
the strength of the bombs used on Japan during the second world war, this test
was over 150% more powerful than the nuclear physicists and engineers had
anticipated and erased one of the islands in the atoll off the map. In the years to follow, radiation sickness,
death, miscarriages and genetic anomalies were the visible specters that
haunted the world and persistent lies, assurances of safety later proven to be
erroneous, and secrecy were the more phantasmal and ephemeral legacies.
Four days following the first nuclear test over the islands
in 1946, a French mechanical engineer unveiled a new swimming fashion which was
named "bikini" in response to the sudden media frenzy over the
nuclear test. Louis Réard clad at 19-year old nude
dancer from Casino de Paris - Micheline Bernardini - in 30 square inches of
cloth winning the distinction of creating the "smallest bathing
suit in the world". He insisted
that, to qualify as a true bikini, the swimsuit material had be sufficiently
scarce to easily "pass through a wedding ring".
Two 'accidentally larger than intended' explosions - one
gargantuan and one itsy-bitsy - both bear the name of an island in the Pacific
that was obliterated by a colossal lack of humanity. And few people alive today pay the legacy
even a passing thought. While we could
be distracted by the bikinis, it's worth considering what both of these legacies
say about how we've become the society that is manifesting today.
The Illusory Value of
Secret
The reason why the U.S. tested nuclear weapons was to
instill fear in those who didn't share our capitalist, consumer-first
mandate. Fearing the specter of
communism in which autocrats select economic winners and losers (can anyone say
bailouts?) and an intrusive authoritarian state in which the state would
senselessly pry into the private lives of its citizens in an effort to
manipulate and control them (oops, can anyone say Edward Snowden?), the U.S.
decided that it should secretly test a device that would create fall-out across
the world jeopardizing populations that we didn't see as human and poisoning water and land we didn't really wish to foul. Through the cunning use of code names, we
blew our cover across the globe to insure that all knew that we'd stop at
nothing to pursue our quality of life which was so superior as to require fear
and military strength to promote and defend it.
Through the veil of secrecy, billions of dollars were poured to enrich
the secret programs that would serve to propagate our 'values'. By keeping the project 'secret' we would
capture the imagination (and the patronage) of the public who were willingly
kept in fear and intrigue.
Let's face it, a bikini as an article of clothing, doesn't
keep much 'secret'. In point of fact,
the strategically placed triangular fabric swatches actually draw attention to
the faux modesty they supposedly intend to defend. By keeping certain anatomical parts 'covered'
we maintain the illusion of discretion while in fact promoting their
distinction.
In bombs and bathing suits, the value of 'secret' and
'discretion' is a fallacy. To the
contrary, it is by promoting what you're not supposed to see that the cultural
obsession is transacted and consummated.
Sensational Sells
Réard first called his two-piece wonder the Atome,
assuming that it would conjure the idea of small. But when the public went ballistic about the
atomic tests, the name 'bikini' was on everyone's lips and, seizing the
opportunity, he quickly jumped on the mushrooming phenomenon leading to the
name that persists to this day.
By 1954, the U.S. knew that atomic bombs worked with
terrifying effectiveness. So did the
rest of the world. But it also knew that
the public wasn't so sure that these weapons were a good idea. As a result, continuously upping the tonnage
was a wonderful way to increase the funding frenzy required to proliferate ever
increasing stockpiles of weapons - weapons whose existence was justified
because "the Russians" could do unto us what we were demonstrating we
could do to them.
It's amusing that neither the bikini nor the hydrogen bomb's
societal effect was fully appreciated at the time of their detonation. Both of them succeeded by landing on a
particular moral paradox - offensive enough to discuss with moral derision but
powerful and revealing enough to hold the public's fascination. And I find this particular dynamic a
fascinating study in macabre mercantile genius. Create an object that society finds
objectionable enough to proliferate in conversation but tantalizing enough to
empower an aspirational attraction and you're likely to have a commercial
bonanza. The bomb didn't create the
military industrial complex nor fuel the Cold War - it merely served as a
larger-than-life example of our capacity to enforce our ideology. The bikini has nothing to do with modesty or
morality - it merely lampoons our incapacity to deal with our abject failure to
understand eroticism, beauty, and sensuality. Both of these sensational predations work
because they share an implausible, incredulous scale (albeit at opposite ends
of the spectrum in size) that sates a particular seductive power.
On this anniversary of the bombs (and bombshells) I wonder
if we've progressed much over the past 60 plus years. When Wolf
of Wall Street and Gravity fill
theater seats and when we breathlessly watch tired ideological oppression
justify senseless suffering from the Ukraine to Syria, I find myself longing
for more examples of human-scale, naked, modesty where we're known by what we
offer humanity rather than define ourselves by how inhumane we can be. The Bikini illusion of 60 years ago made a
splash on the canvas of humanity's meandering story but it preyed upon the
worst of our consensus fears - the fear of the 'other' and the fear of our own
desires. It seems that it would be
fitting to mark this moment with a call to transparent living and engagement in
which we've got nothing to hide. The
fallout from this idea wouldn't keep us off the beach!
.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. I look forward to considering this in the expanding dialogue. Dave