Economists are scratching their heads over the dawning of
2016 about as vigorously as a kindergarten class with an outbreak of lice. 2015 went off like a damp squib with official
estimates for economic growth at a globally imperceptible 1.9 percent or
so. The wizards at Goldman Sachs have
revised their estimates for growth down nearly 20% from just a year ago – not very
heartening when you consider the numerator in this equation. Commodity dependent economies ranging from
Australia to Venezuela are looking at the most bleak economic forecasts in
recent times courtesy of the lower demand for oil, copper and other extractive
industry resources. Profits are
shrinking in most major sectors; costs of capital are at their subsidized
nadirs, and the ability for the great capitalist hegemonic illusion to remain propped
up is about as resolute as a drunken reveler the morning after Mardi Gras.
Seventy-one years since the Bretton Woods grand imperial
utopian experiment and it looks like the unconsidered assumptions of this
Icarian dream have finally been melted by the sun. Next stop – a watery grave marked by melted
wax and feathers. Allow me to broaden
the metaphor.
Leading up to Bretton Woods, the United States and its
allies were fighting a motivated, technologically unified foe led by Germany
and a ruthlessly ideologically emboldened Japan. In the ideological morass oozing from the
Great War a few decades earlier, the world was in the labyrinth of faux
socialism that would make the most astute minotaur pine for a sudden
death. Franklin D Roosevelt and his
vice-president Harry Truman were busily placating a largely impoverished
populace with grand projects that would forever prove the beneficence of big
government. Marx and Engels had been
sufficiently long dead and forgotten so as to make the Soviet Union a festering
ground for the metastasis of communism – a lovely extreme but for the autocratic
tyranny of those who determine what is in the best interest for all “others”
while they themselves live in cloistered opulence. Germany knew that the solution rested in the elimination
of the “others” while Japan, with its centuries of bigotry and classism, knew
that they were more German exclusionists than Great Experiment capitalists or
communists. So, in or around 1945, the
world decided to set itself on a collision course with 2017.
Now before you go off trying to decipher the significance of
72 years (which may be a wonderful diversion for some of you), let me simply
offer the following comment. The life
expectancy of humans on Earth right now is 71 years. It is merely informative to realize that the
social and political experiments that were constructed to institutionalize
capitalist socialism (pensions, social securities, and the like) are likely not
going to survive the generation for which they were designed. But allow me to return to the Icarus
metaphor.
When We The People were advised that governments were going
to care for what communities once saw as their purview, we were giddy and
strapped on the wings fashioned in the shop of a master craftsman (Daedalus in
our story). Being the designer of said
wings our paternalistic overlords knew that wings of wax are best not used in
proximity to the sun. But unlike
Daedalus, not only did our patrons not advise the risks of solar approximation,
they encouraged it. Using the cunning
wax of central bank manipulation and the seemingly innocent feathers of
industrialized consumption, they created the thermals that were euphemistically
called “economic growth”. And away their
charges (literally, in each sense of the word) flew. Daedalus had King Minos – both patron and
prison warden – to escape. FDR’s great
experiment had the petro-dollar as both patron and prison warden. Both end in heartbreak when the children fly
too close to the sun.
The melting wax in our metaphor is the growing illiquidity
of the great promises that were made a generation ago. In the past few years, we’ve seen Portugal,
Italy, Greece, Syria, Spain, Venezuela, Japan and Brazil struggle with the fact
that social promises unkept lead to social and political upheaval. To date, these countries have had incremental
albeit inconsequential impact on the global stage courtesy of Central Bank
manipulation. However, as the U.S.
social security illiquidity comes due in 2017 (first hitting the elderly and
the indigent) and as other economies follow suit in close proximity, the reduction
in “growth” will rapidly accelerate into a paroxysm far more destabilizing than
2008. Not to worry, we could have Donald
Trump as President so we should be just fine… ummm…. maybe I should consider
moving now!
Now these impending challenges are just that. Challenges.
We created them and we can resolve them.
But it takes a healthy dose of optical physics and courage to get a view
of the solutions.
First: parallax.
Parallax is the optical illusion in which objects closer seem to be
larger and more mobile than objects seen at a distance. Bretton Woods was a great example of the
error in reality created by confusing parallax for objective reality. Just because the “other” was further away
didn’t mean that we could ignore “them”.
And now that “they” – countries like India, China, Brazil, and much of
the African nations – have become increasingly economically engaged – “they”
are closer meaning that their size and movement appears more
consequential. China, for example,
always mattered. But now that they
appear to be larger and move more nimbly, they’re suddenly deemed important. “They” were always important. And when “they” was a euphemism for “cheap”
and “enslavable” “we” didn’t care. But
know that “they” are “we”, we have to care.
Second: aperture.
Aperture is the process of selective narrowing and collimating of a
reflected field of view to achieve depth of view and focus. When one limits one’s perspective, it’s easy
to find monolithic solutions. When one
opens perspective to include a wider range of inputs, pluralistic reality
becomes much more evident and requires more actors to be fully informed and
engaged.
To weather the coming economic storm and achieve more of a
dive than a cataclysmic fall into the watery abyss, we need to bring ourselves into
closer proximity to each other and we need to expand our informed
engagement! That requires a commitment
to learn, stretch our awareness, and lessen our dependence on paternalistic
systems that were built not to care for us but to disintermediate our care for our
neighbor. As we enter 2016, make a
commitment to share your wealth, compassion, and industry with someone you didn’t
include in your circle in 2015. And,
with any luck, we’ll find a more reliable way to fly.
x
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. I look forward to considering this in the expanding dialogue. Dave