O.K. I admit it. I was putting off watching The
Big Short for a bunch of reasons.
The first was simple. I was
talking about the House of Cards
financial risk before the “discovery” of the mortgage crisis portrayed in the film. In fact, when I met with the Richmond Federal
Reserve in 1999, I pointed out that I had better visibility on intangible
asset liens in commercial lending than banks had on pooled
mortgages. The President of the Richmond
Fed at the time agreed with me! While
the protagonists in The Big Short were running around in 2005 and 2006 placing
their bets against the market collapse, I was trying to wake people up to what
was coming. To the fact that President
George W. Bush’s “patriotic” plea for Americans to over-consume and use their
home equity as an ATM in the wake of September 11, 2001 was a horrible idea
that blended short-term consumer debt dynamics with long-term real estate debt guaranteeing
structural collapse. To the fact that
rating agencies admitted to not having any mechanism to measure the veracity of
over 80% of the credit assets of the economy.
To the fact that the U.S. economy was built on plagiarized and
illegitimate intellectual property. To
the fact that rating agencies were churning out ratings to sell products to
investors and derelict in their fiduciary duty to measure risk. And, when the dust settled, the public lost
well over $5 trillion.
The second reason was a bit more complicated. There’s an even bigger certainty on the
horizon and we’re either hypnotized or near-euthanized so much that we’re
pretending not to see it. Setting aside
the nearly $19 trillion in national debt in the U.S. alone, there’s about $11
trillion in illiquid government associated financial products that are coming
due over the next few years – social security, school loans, packaged
mortgages, and depository insurance – products that are owned by retirees,
ordinary citizens, and institutions and that will be subject to actual or
manipulated default. According to the
Social Security Administration’s own numbers, the safety net for aging and
disabled Americans vanishes around 2035 and that is assuming that benefits shrink
by over 12% in 2017 and premiums rise by the same amount or more! Where the GFC of 2007-2008 was a shock felt
round the world, the current U.S. economic chasm is close to six times greater than the GFC. This is NOT my estimate. These are publicly available statistics. And we’re pretending that the only news worth
discussing is the theater between a xenophobic cartoon and a moral
chameleon.
"I
believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than
standing armies. If the American people
ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by
inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up
around the banks will deprive the people of all property - until their children
wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." Thomas Jefferson, 1802
See, my problem with The Big Short has nothing to do with
the superb writing, acting, directing and production. It is elegant and brilliant. My problem is that we’ve become so accustomed
to the stories of being lied to and robbed that we have seen it as
entertainment rather than tyranny. And
while I’ve just come from Papua New Guinea where I’m repeatedly warned of
government corruption, I look at an American economy that willfully lies to the
public, willfully and negligently defrauds its citizens and it is this America
that deigns to judge the corruption lubricated by U.S. and Australian dollars
and Chinese yuan! We pretend that
trillions of dollars of losses and bailouts are just the price of doing
business but we neglect the fact that each of those losses comes at the price
of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness among the rank and file. Slow bleedings, to be sure, but the body is
already anemic and a financial plague is just around the corner.
Together with the remarkable producer and director of the internationally
acclaimed Future Dreaming, I have commenced work on a new film that seeks
to preempt the “who could have seen it coming?” refrains that reverberated
around the empty shell of what used to be Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers at
the end of the past decade. In the film
I discuss the architecture of an economic system that is built on explicit
ignorance to the all-in-consequence of our industrial and consumer behaviors
and the fact that such systems have only been able to be propped up by intermittent,
horribly violent military contrivances resulting in the deaths of
millions. Who could have seen this
coming? Well, once again, Thomas
Jefferson stated that “…it is incumbent on every generation to pay its own
debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of
the world.”
Watching The Big Short reminded me that we’ve
got an even more vexing challenge. In
the film, there is an effort to acknowledge that the celebrations surrounding
winning the bet against the American economy were occasionally tempered with
the sober knowledge that economic hardship would put people out of work, would
expand homelessness and poverty, would lead some to suicide, and would have
generational effects that will be slow in their evolution. The fiduciary “obligation” that the fund
managers had to maximize investor returns led the anonymous wealthy to curse
the prognostication of fraud before the collapse and then dismissively cash in
on their spoils with no regard for the lives that they’d cost after the fact. At no point does it dawn on someone that a
>400% profit may mean that the public was as robbed by the opportunist short
investor as they were by the Federal Reserve and Treasury Ponzi scheme. And this leads me to my own paradox.
I know that the U.S. market is well past the point of no
return with respect to indebtedness and illiquid pension liabilities. I know that hundreds of public companies –
many of whom have been off-shoring assets for years – have massive liabilities
for securities and financial misrepresentations. My guess is that off-shoring has as much to
do with known fraud as it does “tax efficiency”. I know that several countries have adopted
U.S. market models only to run the risk of greater instability. Australia, for example, is drinking the
Kool-Aid around venture capital and making illiquid markets part of its pension
scheme without realizing that the U.S. VC model required highly nuanced tax
loss harvesting, robust middle market private equity, and price collusion –
none of which are suitably in place for the average Australian investor. The ECB is pretending that the quantitative
easing (read Ponzi scheme) that has failed in the U.S. will somehow have a
better outcome in fractious Europe. The
oil rich Middle East is now realizing that its gilded age may be losing some of
its glint with oil depressed and unlikely to rise soon. And Pandora’s box has had some lid slippage
with the Petrobras corruption allegations in Brazil. In other words, the current system has run
its course and the Bretton Woods experiment has concluded.
And I’m not alone. In
his March 9, 2016 note entitled “Japanese
Policy Failure Means Disaster for Us All”, John Mauldin details what he and
others see in the near future with the “major economic disruption in Japan.” Citing work by Mohamed El-Erian, he details
the reflexive and unchartered courses being implemented by central banks which
have been using classical economic theory in a market that has not fully
understood the implications of demographic shifts, productivity challenges,
quantitative international trading techniques and countless other anomalies. El-Erian concludes that the, “implications go
well beyond economics and finance, extending also to national politics,
regional and global negotiations, and geopolitics.” He continues, “Unless we understand the
nature of the disruptive forces, including tipping points and T-junctions, we
will likely fall short in our reaction functions. And the more that happens, the greater the
likelihood we could lose control of an orderly economic, financial, and political
destiny – both for our generation and future ones.” As was the case in the turns of the 19th
and 20th century, these transitions are not without their
opportunistic winners. The few wealthy
individuals who, in moments of crisis, can offer bailouts to governments (often
to pay for wartime indebtedness) are the ones who set the tone for centuries of
predatory enslavement of the general population. Only this time, the denomination of “wealth”
might be a bit tricky as the mere accumulation of debt-based currencies may in
fact render the “wealth” quite ephemeral and fleeting. While synthetic derivatives and swaps, agency
debt, “risk-free” bonds, and the like may be proliferating once again like
fungal spores in a rainforest, the arbiter of the impending dislocation will
likely be those who have elected to secure control of resources and means of
production. A world awash in financial instruments
and hedges will likely become a barren landscape when those who have been
chasing amoral yield for its own sake are exposed.
So, do I take the path – like the traders in The
Big Short – and bet against the fact that you’ll never read this post
or understand it if you do? Or do I work
to tell a better story – one that is built on Integral Accountability where
returns may not come in currencies (fiat, debt, or crypto)? The answer is that I’m choosing
humanity. I’m investing my time, my
creativity, and my efforts on getting into the trenches with those who want to
be part of a human experiment that learns from the past and explicitly forgoes
the predation on ignorance that was celebrated in the film. I may wind up with a lot less money. I may wind up with less gadgets and gizmos. And in the end, I may underestimate the long
arm of fraud and corruption that will continue to fool a public through cunning
illusions. Over the next several months,
together with a great team of luminaries, we’re launching Future Dreaming: The Awakening
which will be a series of gatherings around the world in which we’ll build new
models of enterprise. I’m honored to
stand with amazing colleagues who have committed to go LONG humanity! Let’s tell that story!
I see living within sight of Monticello for so many years has had its influence...
ReplyDeleteAny gatherings planned for Ireland/UK? Please keep me posted.
ReplyDeleteThanks Dave. I read it. I think I understand it. I think you are doing the right thing. To hell with excess material possessions. To hell with living like the rich and famous. Feel good and sleep well at night.
ReplyDelete