Seventy two years ago today, aboard the USS Missouri, the Japanese government signed the Instrument of
Surrender bringing to an end their involvement in World War II and permanently barring
them from engaging activities that would allow them to “re-arm” for war. This week, without provocation from Japan,
the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea launched a missile that flew above
Japan. Within hours, the global media
was buzzing with the prospects of re-arming Japan. In 1945, the U.S., China, the United Kingdom,
the USSR (Russia), the Commonwealth of Australia, the Dominion of Canada, the
provisional Government of France, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and the Dominion
of New Zealand stood united in their resolve to end hostilities, to defend the
Pacific, and to work towards a common good in the world.
Seventy two years later the situation is quite altered. The U.S. is engaged in militant rhetoric with
North Korea. Russia and China are both
advising negotiations and talks. The
U.K. is so engaged with its protectionist agenda it is blissfully on the
side-lines. Australia is spending record
amounts of money to subsidize U.S. and European defense contractors to arm
themselves and the region with “strategic assets” for a defense doctrine that
is patently absurd. Australia is
preparing to defend itself against the threats posed by China and “terrorists”
despite the fact that its largest trading partner is China. Over 34% of Australia’s exports go to China
followed by 15% to Japan. No other
trading partner even makes it out of single digit percentages. Oh, and for the record, Australia intends to
spend 5600% of its export trade with France for its submarines and 1100% of its
export trade with Germany for its land vehicles.
Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and Nagasaki (August 9, 1945) are
the only two populated cities to be bombed by the United States of America with
nuclear weapons. The same U.S. that
insists that North Korea shouldn’t have a bomb is the perpetrator of history’s
only evidence of the use thereof. With an
immediate death toll of estimated between 129,000 and 220,000 people and with a
subsequent physical and mental toll in the millions, this unspeakable
technological depravity took the murderous business of war to an inconceivable
scale. And while perpetrators and
historians alike defend the barbarism as a necessary evil to end Japan’s
resolve in the war, the seduction of mass destruction went viral.
So when, over the past few weeks, President Donald Trump has
sought to goad North Korea into precipitous foolishness (on both sides, let me
assure, both sides), I reflect on some of the mercantile facts that seem to be
eluding the real and fake media alike.
Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are armed by the
U.S. Rounding out the top 10 countries
we officially arm are Turkey, South Korea, Australia, Taiwan, India, Singapore,
Iraq, and Egypt. Oh, and then there are
the top recipients of foreign military financing leading off with Israel, Egypt,
Jordan, Pakistan, and Iraq. Isn’t it
ironic that Pakistan – a nuclear power and nuclear proliferator – is being
financed by the U.S. while they are also inextricably linked to the North
Korean nuclear program?
Over 1/3 of the world’s disclosed arms trade originates in
the United States making it the largest exporter of armaments.
The U.S. doesn’t export arms directly to North Korea but would
certainly like to have ample reasons to diversify its sales to Japan, Taiwan,
and South Korea. And with 40% of its
weapons currently flowing to the Middle East, market diversification is vital
to the commercial interests of the U.S.
Missile defense systems are big business.
Having evidence of the “need” for missile defense is a vital
market development tool. Remember how
valuable Iron Dome was for Israel?
Missile intercept technologies are a much more competitive marketplace
and owning the future of missile defense business will put the U.S., Russia,
China, India, Israel, and France in fierce competition for dominance.
The world has lived with the experiential specter of nuclear
weapons for 72 years. This menace to
human decency fueled the Cold War mercantile interests of a few for the better
part of 35 years. We’re now in an era
where the diffuse enemies created by cartographers, ideologues, and despots (on
both sides, really, on both sides) do not conveniently create industrial
efficiencies. Variously arming thugs –
from Toyota’s ubiquitous presence in land transport for all manner of
vigilantes, to unmanned air, land and sea vehicles, arms and explosives – industrial
scale defense contractors would benefit from a more robust and sizable
threat. And missile defense is just the
right target. Let’s face it. If we really cared about state and non-state
actors having nuclear weapons, we’d realize that Pakistan’s Punjab Province
nuclear arsenal is as likely put in service to North Korea or Iran as it is to “deter”
India from attacking. And Pakistan is
capable of putting their nuclear arsenal in any neighborhood on the globe with
submarine and surface delivery efficiency rivaling the U.S., Russia, or France. We don’t want a “nuclear free” Korean Peninsula. We want armaments markets that serve our
commercial interest.
So 72 years later, have we as world citizens learned
anything? Precious little! Using our taxes, governments are rattling
sabers in an effort to instill fear and uncertainty in the populace. Unquestioningly, a cowed public is taught to
fear and surrogate their sense of security to the architects of the menace in
the first place. And, when we all
blindly call for defense and security, the government acting on our behalf and
with our blind confidence, obliges with more technologies of terror. This genius, nefarious system has been
working with remarkable efficiency for thousands of years. And it will until we realize that putting
real people under flying missiles does not advance an ideology or moral “right”. It merely puts real people in real harm. It’s time for us to realize that governments
and their benefactors are NOT serving their headline missions. Instead, they’re creating instability into
which those who prey thereon can serve their gluttonous ends. And it’s time, on this anniversary of the end
of hostilities, that We The People stop falling for the lies and start building
our common defense – namely, erasing fear and rage with engagement and
understanding. Salam, Pax, Paz,
Nyimbur-ma, Achukma, Heiwa, Peace, Heping, Mir, you get the point.
xx
We need a global grass roots movement to eliminate nuclear weapons. I was a Air Force Weapons Control Mechanic during the Cuban Missile Crises, working on the F101-B interceptor that carried two-infrared missiles and two Genie atomic rockets. Our planes were all loaded. I've been concerned ever since, more than ever now.http://www.helencorson.org/fcnl/
ReplyDeleteNo, we need a grass roots movement to end the wealthy controlling government, the rest will follow.
ReplyDelete