For the past week, I’ve been on an observer mission. I was generously invited to Rwanda to witness
the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Extraordinary Session of the
African Union. Among the many events of
the week, I took part in the AfCFTA Business Forum promoted under the title “Leveraging the Power of Business to Drive
Africa’s Integration.” Witnessing
the sage pluck with which H.E. Olusegun Obasanjo, Former President of Nigeria,
confidently challenged sitting Presidents to improve their knowledge of
business and the world was poetically brilliant theater. The polished sagacity of H.E. Emmerson Mnangagwa,
President of Zimbabwe responding to journalists with flawless reference to
constitutional rule of law was legendary.
And the social adept positioning of issues like cross-border freedom of
movement demonstrated by H.E. Cyril Ramaphosa, President of South Africa, put many
of the deflection-oriented world leaders to shame.
But as I listened to the speeches at the African Continental
Free Trade Area Business Forum on 20 March, 2018 and as I
traveled to universities, businesses, and ministries this week, I kept hearing
Genesis 1:27 echoing in my mind. Into What Image and Likeness is
Rwanda Being Crafted? When the Germans saw the region as a coffee
production opportunity, was that a Rwandan vision? When the Belgian’s saw
the region as an agriculture and religious colony, was that a Rwandan
vision? When Louvain Catholic University’s Reverend Canon Achille Salee
and F. Delhay conducted the geological surveys to provide the basis for
Rwanda-Urundi Tin Mines Company (1930) and the Muhinga-Kigali Mining Company
(1934) did the casserite, wolframite, and coltan serve a Rwandan-defined vision
for the land or its people? And when UN, IMF and other Development
Agencies tell Rwanda that it must be an ICT hub today, does anyone in
Rwanda know the wheel or the car to which that hub is attached? Is
becoming an educated, low labor cost cog in a global supply chain the aspiration
of the country or is it a necessity of the callous colonial industrial engine
that eats the souls and lives of the laborer-consumer mandate?
I watched Heads of State and their agents recite the catechism
of “Development” that has been the grist for the industrial colonial overlord’s
mill for decades. Without a moment of
consideration, the following doctrinal invocations were hypnotically dispensed:
The pursuit of business
is for the sake of profit.
The population of
a place must be seen as consumers.
The aggregation of wealth
by the few will inure to its distribution
to others.
And of course, economic
growth is the only path to a better
society.
Past President Obasanjo offered the only glancing deviation
from the dogma when he observed in unprepared remarks that “Education without
employment is very dangerous.”
Should we lament the location in which this summit occurred? While Rwandan President H.E. Paul Kagame has,
in fact, presided over the pacification and social reconciliation of a country torn
apart by colonial-power fueled genocide barely 3 decades ago, I saw a
disturbing narrative emerge. Rwandans
have modeled the power of reconciliation between themselves to be sure. And well done there! But no voice was raised to indict the colonial
influence of the Catholic Church and the largely European (and now Asians) “developers”
who continue to see the region and the continent as indentured laboring
consumers. The establishment of ICT
training and call centers received more attention than the reconsideration of
enterprise at its essence. If one
country in Africa can finally consume and use more computers and smart phones built
on the relentless trade of conflict metals from slave-labor conditions in
another part of Africa, have we “developed”?
If Rwanda’s economic success comes at the expense of its neighbors, is
it success? And to be clear, President Kagame IS an out-spoken voice for a new narrative but he's constantly bombarded with loud voices reinforcing a dominant narrative that has derailed many visionaries before.
What if business was for the balanced stewardship of both
resources and utilities in which the primary objective was to achieve maximum benefit
with the least inefficiency? What if social
impact and reputation for quality and access were valued above the profits derived
from capital and ignorance arbitrage? After
all, to be a “better market”, governments had to provide inducements to foreign
corporations that include tax concessions, profit repatriation, and land
appropriation. Is that success or is it
seduction? When Africa is described as a
“market of 1.2 billion people”, have any of us stopped to consider the colonial
dependencies not only on what is on
offer but who is doing the offering?
In my lecture at the University of Rwanda at the generous
invitation of Amb. Dr. Charles Murigande I discussed the subtle – yet important
– distinction between what it means to “Choose” an outcome or “Select” from
what’s on offer. To choose, I argued, is
a process in which observation, discernment, valuation, and consideration are
fully engaged. To select, on the other
hand, is to be presented with a series of options and rank them. In the case of the former, the individual or
community is encouraged to become highly informed and engaged. In the latter, the individual or community is
cowed into opaque motivations by anonymous actors. In the AfCFTA summit and its appendages,
selection – not choice – was on offer.
Education – defined by governments and institutions controlling the
narrative – is for jobs in sectors that serve a global product and service
mandate – NOT an African-defined vision.
Infrastructure is selected to satisfy the multi-national corporation’s
production and distribution mandates.
After all, no one questioned whether the Africa of tomorrow could
transcend the addiction put in motion over 100 years ago by Edison and Westinghouse. Electronics are assumed, not chosen. No one considered whether within the biome,
topography and culture of Africa there are options for power, transport, health,
nutrition, and an array of other opportunities that leap-frog the last century’s
addictions and inefficiencies. In short,
the summit was not about Africa as the birthplace of humanity but rather the
cul-de-sac of Western and Asian consumption-fueled economic models.
If We The People want to evidence a “better” version of
business, social interactions, political structures, or our own existential
improvement, its time to CHOOSE wisely.
Rather than selecting from the buffet designed to make us compliantly
obese, let’s emancipate ourselves to critique what’s been on offer and choose a
new path. And maybe, with a little bit
of luck, Africa can model for the rest of the world A More Perfect Union!
x