An amazing blog written by my dear friend Amanda Gore - worth the read!
Friday, January 24, 2020
Wednesday, January 22, 2020
Tensegrity: How do we divide equity?
The following is excerpted from a letter I have sent to some business partners. I thought some of you might find it helpful.
Dear Colleagues,
When we met several months ago, I did my best to
introduce what I refer to as the “Breathing Enterprise” business model. As the name implies, this process seeks to
insure that our efforts carefully consider each element of a healthy and
organic process that is aligned with how life quite literally happens. Informed by the way the living cell unlocks
the power of sunlight from glucose, the Breathing Enterprise model is both
prescriptive and diagnostic. We can use
it as a template and it serves equally as a means to diagnose how an effort is
not running as it could. And before we get
caught up in dividing the baby, let’s make sure we’re super clear on what we
have locked in and what we have ignored.
Let’s start with the key elements. Within the model, there are 6 domains of
value which require equivalent attention and stewardship. These have to do with the Alchemy of
how we transform effort to value; how we make Apparent our organization
of effort into a reproducible product or service; and, our Essence –
what we know and how we are known.
Any successful venture will recognize that holding these 6
dimensions in tension and balance (Buckminster Fuller’s notion of ‘tensegrity’)
is the only way to build an organization that requires no external intervention
as all the energy required is based on the structural integrity itself.
The mistake that is made by many (dare I say, most)
organizations is to prioritize technology and money and leave the
other things to be relegated to ‘solvable with money’. This – by definition – is unsustainable. When we place equivalent value on each of the
6 dimensions, we learn that we also see the need to reward, incentivize and compensate
in equivalent ways. A ‘preferred’ return
in one dimension without preference in others means that enterprise failure is
most assured. When a “financial”
investor is preferred over the personnel team or the branding manager – the
institution suffers a fatal cultural (and ultimately, existential) harm.
So, before we start divvying up “equity” (a horrible abuse
of a poorly understood term), let’s make sure that we allocate equivalence
across the domains of value so as to insure appropriate and suitable value
recognition to all participants. And yes,
for those of you who are doing the math, if an investor wants more than 16.7%
of a business (one-sixth of the enterprise), he or she better be accountable to
deliver on the other dimensions of value.
If it’s for money alone – run, don’t walk away.
x
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)